Insert Greatest Common Divisors in Linked List
Medium · Linked List · Explanation and code example
Simulation
How it works
The problem asks us to insert a new node between every pair of adjacent nodes, where the new node's value is the GCD of its neighbors. We traverse the list and for each pair of consecutive nodes, compute their gcd and create a new node with that value.
The Euclidean algorithm efficiently computes the gcd: repeatedly replace the larger number with the remainder of dividing the two numbers until one becomes zero. The other number is the gcd.
Since we're inserting nodes as we traverse, we need to be careful to advance the pointer past the newly inserted node to avoid processing it again.
Steps
- Start with
curpointing to the head of the list. - While
cur.nextexists:- Get the values of
curandcur.nextasn1andn2. - Compute their
gcdusing the Euclidean algorithm. - Create a new node with the
gcdvalue. - Insert it between
curandcur.nextby adjusting pointers. - Move
curtocur.next.nextto skip over the newly inserted node.
- Get the values of
- Return the head of the modified list.
Complexity
- Time complexity:
O(n * log (min(a, b))) - Space complexity:
O(n)space for the gcd ListNodes.O(1)extra space.
Where
nis the length of the given list, andaandbare two numbers passed to thegcd()function.
Things to watch for
Processing Newly Inserted Nodes
After inserting a GCD node between cur and cur.next, forgetting to skip over the newly inserted node causes an infinite loop. The pointer must advance by two positions (cur = cur.next.next) to move past both the inserted node and reach the next original node that needs processing.
Incorrect GCD Implementation
Implementing the Euclidean algorithm incorrectly by not handling the base case properly or swapping values in the wrong order. The algorithm should continue until one value becomes zero, and the order of operands in the modulo operation matters. Using a % b when a < b returns a, which is correct, but some implementations incorrectly assume a > b.
Off-by-One at List End
Attempting to access cur.next.val when cur.next is null causes a null pointer exception. The loop condition must be while cur.next (not while cur) to ensure there is always a valid pair of adjacent nodes to compute the GCD between.
Python code example
from typing import Optional
from math import gcd
# Definition for singly-linked list.
# class ListNode:
# def __init__(self, val=0, next=None):
# self.val = val
# self.next = next
class Solution:
def insertGreatestCommonDivisors(self, head: Optional[ListNode]) -> Optional[ListNode]:
def gcd(a, b):
while b > 0:
a, b = b, a % b
return a
cur = head
while cur.next:
n1, n2 = cur.val, cur.next.val
cur.next = ListNode(gcd(n1, n2), cur.next)
cur = cur.next.next
return head
C++ code example
/**
* Definition for singly-linked list.
* struct ListNode {
* int val;
* ListNode *next;
* ListNode() : val(0), next(nullptr) {}
* ListNode(int x) : val(x), next(nullptr) {}
* ListNode(int x, ListNode *next) : val(x), next(next) {}
* };
*/
class Solution {
public:
ListNode* insertGreatestCommonDivisors(ListNode* head) {
if (!head) return nullptr;
ListNode* cur = head;
while (cur->next) {
int n1 = cur->val, n2 = cur->next->val;
int gcdValue = gcd(n1, n2);
ListNode* newNode = new ListNode(gcdValue, cur->next);
cur->next = newNode;
cur = newNode->next;
}
return head;
}
private:
int gcd(int a, int b) {
while (b > 0) {
int temp = b;
b = a % b;
a = temp;
}
return a;
}
};
Source and license
Adapted from NeetCode’s source · MIT license. Node types are supplied by LeetCode where needed.